51ÖØ¿ÚÁÔÆæ

The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: ).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Contact Allergy to Methacrylate Containing Nail Products : Lack of Impact of EU Legislation. An Audit on Behalf of the European Environmental Contact Dermatitis Research Group (EECDRG)

Author

  • S. Mark Wilkinson
  • Olivier Aerts
  • Tove Agner
  • Magnus Bruze
  • Richard Brans
  • Caterina Foti
  • Ana Maria Giménez-Arnau
  • Luca Stingeni
  • Cecilia Svedman

Summary, in English

Background: There is a current fashion for the use of methacrylate-containing nail cosmetics that can induce allergic contact dermatitis. European Union (EU) legislation was introduced in 2021 that had the aim of preventing its development. Objectives: To assess prevalence and exposures causing contact allergy to 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) prior to and following implementation of the legislation. Methods: A retrospective audit was conducted by 7 European centres patch testing to HEMA prior to the legislation and for 2 years afterwards. Results: A total of 26 297 patients were tested to HEMA in the baseline series between 2016 and 2023. The prevalence of contact allergy to HEMA from all sources amongst females was 2.82% compared to 0.34% amongst males. The prevalence of nail related contact allergy rose from 0.91% in 2016 (2 centres) to: 0.99% in 2017 (3 centres); 1.24% in 2018 (5 centres); 1.23% in 2019 (6 centres); 1.36% in 2020 (7 centres); 1.30% in 2021 (7 centres); 1.52% in 2022 (7 centres) and 1.98% in 2023 (7 centres). Contact allergy to HEMA from exposure to nail cosmetics accounted for 3.4% of all occupational skin disease. Conclusions: EU legislation appears not to have had the intended impact on controlling allergic contact dermatitis from methacrylates in nail cosmetics. There is an urgent need to revisit Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) opinion to reconsider exposure to methacrylates and cross-reactions between them. A strategy needs to be developed and implemented to better control the current outbreak.

Publishing year

2025

Language

English

Pages

283-290

Publication/Series

Contact Dermatitis

Volume

92

Issue

4

Links

Document type

Journal article

Publisher

Wiley-Blackwell

Topic

  • Dermatology and Venereal Diseases

Keywords

  • 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate
  • acrylic nail
  • CAS 868-77-9
  • contact allergy
  • gel nail
  • legislation
  • public safety

Status

Published

Research group

  • Occupational and Environmental Dermatology

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 0105-1873